|
Lemon, C. (2005). Using technology to teach content in a
student teaching experience (and as a first year teacher). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss1/general/article3.cfm

Using Technology to Teach Content in a
Student Teaching Experience (and as a First Year Teacher)
Cheryl Lemon
Gateway Regional High School
Editor's Note: Cheryl Lemon
received her bachelor’s degree in biology from the University of
South Carolina, and in fall 2002 she entered the secondary science teacher
intern program in the College of Education at Lehigh University. In the
secondary teacher intern program, graduates earn a master’s degree
in secondary education and Instructional I certification to teach in Pennsylvania
public schools. The 14-week student teaching experience for which Cheryl’s
exemplary technology use was noted took place in fall 2003.
|
During my Lehigh University field experiences as a preservice teacher,
I had the opportunity to use technology extensively in my instruction. During
my internship, I taught for 7 weeks each at two different high schools.
At Emmaus High School, where I spent my first 7 weeks and used the most technology,
the classroom had an interactive whiteboard. An LCD projector, a TV/VCR combination,
a laserdisc player, and Texas Instrument data collection probes were available.
We later acquired an IntelPlay digital microscope. My mentor teacher and I were
also able to borrow a Classroom Performance System, a handheld interactive response
system. I was able to borrow curriculum from Lehigh, including Biology:
Exploring Life (www.biology.com),
which integrates textbook, Web, and labs.
I was responsible for teaching biology to two very different ability level
classes of ninth-grade students. Two classes consisted of Honors Biology students,
and three classes consisted of Applied Biology students. In this school district,
Applied Biology is a general education course designed for students who have
difficulty learning in academic settings. Frequently, poorly motivated or unmotivated
students populate these classes. Two of the Applied Biology classes were inclusion
classes that had six students with identified learning difficulties.
I constantly thought of ways to enhance my biology lessons by integrating technology
into appropriate curricular contexts. For example, I realized that the Honors
students would have difficulty understanding abstract concepts of the sequential
steps in the light reactions of photosynthesis, a typically difficult concept
for learners to understand. I located a Flash-based interactivity of photosynthesis
from the Biology: Exploring Life curriculum and used an interactive
white board to illustrate and explain the sequential steps of the light reaction.
During the instructional presentation, I used questioning practices to prompt
learners with making predictions of the end products of each sequential step.
As a consequence, my students were actively engaged in the lesson instead of
being passive recipients.
I also used appropriate Web-based simulations to engage learners in exploring
complex phenomena when materials or activities could not be duplicated in the
laboratory. For example, I had the students complete a simulated experiment
that involved exposing a plant to specific wavelengths of light and measuring
the amount of oxygen produced. Through the use of this simulation activity,
the students understood how different wavelengths of light affect biochemical
reactions in a chloroplast.
With the Applied Biology students, I used a variety of technologies with appropriate
pedagogical strategies to assist learners in understanding biological concepts
and processes. Often, I would set up the classroom with a computer displaying
visualizations and activities from Biology: Exploring Life on a projection
screen or an interactive whiteboard. This enabled me to focus students’
attention on the Web-based visualizations that were designed to illustrate key
processes. Direct (highly organized, teacher-led) instruction was used to facilitate
content learning and to assist learners in developing inquiry process skills.
Coaching (structured questioning techniques) was used to assist students in
reasoning through science concepts during content presentations. Online activities
on the interactive whiteboard provided learners with many tactile learning experiences,
such as building a structure, graphing data, and testing variables in a simulated
experiment.
Students with mild disabilities may lack a specific basic skill necessary to
perform a laboratory activity successfully. Such skills may include a computational
skill or something more complex, such as a problem-solving skill. I realized
that my Applied Biology learners would have much difficulty performing basic
laboratory techniques, so I used an online prelaboratory activity to assist
learners in understanding the biological processes that would be occurring in
a photosynthetic rate laboratory. This allowed me to model effectively the use
of appropriate laboratory tools and to organize data so students could more
easily see patterns in order to analyze them. Thus, my students were able to
perform an inquiry-based experiment successfully without the repeated trial
and error typical for this kind of investigation.
Although I was exposed to a variety of technologies during my preservice education
program, I was eager to learn a new technology during my internship with which
neither my mentor teacher nor I had any prior experience: The Classroom Performance
System. In this system, I used a program to generate biology content questions
that could be answered with multiple choice responses, A, B, C, D. I used the
interactive whiteboard to present these questions to the class. The students
used remote devices to register their answers. The responses were recorded and
displayed on the computer, allowing me to assess student progress immediately.
I learned how to use the system and not only facilitated its use in my classes
but helped other teachers in the science department use this system, as well.
I used this system with the Applied Biology students and discovered that this
approach helped them to review and understand content they had difficulty with.
The students in my classes, especially the Applied Biology students, appreciated
the Web sites and the interactive whiteboard. I rarely had discipline problems, even
when the technology was not working. They understood that I was trying to do
new and different things for them and cooperated. (I had a great group of students
to work with.) The students were often engaged, and I had no problems finding
volunteers, especially if it involved approaching the whiteboard. The students
often asked before class if we were going to use the whiteboard and requested
using other forms of technology. They enjoyed learning through the interactive
Web sites.
At the end of my internship, I asked the students to fill out evaluation forms.
One took the form of a Likert scale, with questions about my teaching methods,
specific activities and technology, and the other was an open ended response
questionnaire. Over 90% of the students who responded said they enjoyed the
Web sites, the white board, and the Classroom Performance System. Several of
the students said in their free responses that they had fun.
One may wonder what influenced my success. I think having the ability to use
so much technology as a student teacher helped enormously. Also, Pat Waller,
my mentor teacher, was willing to do a lot of work "behind the scenes."
This certainly encouraged me to learn how to use the technology and find ways
to integrate it into the classroom. I think many mentor teachers believe that
having a student teacher allows them to take it easy. However, my mentor used
this as an opportunity to use technology and other methods that she normally
would not use. As a result, she had an invested interest in encouraging me to
use the technology while showing me that it is possible and sometimes easier
to teach using the technology.
Dr. Alec Bodzin, my science methods course instructor at Lehigh University,
observed several of my lessons and offered advice about more efficient technology
utilization in my classroom. He was also very helpful in terms of classroom
management and teaching methodology advice.
Beyond adapting technology-based materials for classroom instruction, I also
developed a Web-based inquiry activity called Shark Report (see Figure 1). This
activity has been reviewed and included in the Gateway to Educational Materials
(www.thegateway.org).
As a first year teacher at Gateway Regional High School, I continue to think
of ways to utilize technology as an instructional tool. To assist my Advanced
Placement Biology students in visualizing abstract processes, such as movement
of materials through cells, I use an LCD projector to show interactive animations
found on the Internet and included with the curriculum. I developed a laboratory
utilizing PASCO probeware for my biology students investigating the effects
of acids and bases on buffers. Furthermore, I created a Webquest for my integrated
science students to investigate the causes and effects of the Dead Zone in the
Gulf of Mexico on the mobile wireless laptop computers.
I realize that students at all levels benefit from the use of technology-based
instruction. I constantly think about how technology can be used to enhance
learning and intend to seek new technologies that can be adapted for classroom
applications.
Author Note:
Cheryl Lemon
Gateway Regional High School
Email: clemon@gatewayhs.com
|