|
Bell, L., & Bull, G. (2005). Professional dialog and best practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 5(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss1/editorial/article1.cfm
Professional Dialog and Best Practices
Lynn Bell and Glen Bull, Editors
University of Virginia
The National Technology Leadership Coalition
The CITE Journal is published by the Society for Information Technology and
Teacher Education (SITE) and is one of the more tangible products of a consortium
referred to as the National Technology Leadership Coalition (NTLC). This consortium
was established to provide a forum for collaboration across teacher educator
associations. Its membership includes SITE and the following charter organizations:
• Association for Science Teacher Education
• Association for Mathematics Teacher Educators
• NCTE Conference on English Education
• NCSS College and University Faculty Assembly
• International Society for Technology in Education
Three new members joined the coalition in the past year:
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education
• Association of Teacher Educators
• National Association of the Early Childhood Teacher Educators
In addition to providing an editorial oversight for their respective sections
of the journal, associations in the NTLC provide leadership for SITE committees
and send representatives to an annual autumn retreat—the National Technology
Leadership Summit.
Last year Debra Sprague published an editorial in CITE Journal that asked the
question, “Are We Talking to Ourselves” (2004, Vol. 3, Issue 4).
This editorial called for increased dialog between the educational technology
associations such as SITE and ISTE and the teacher educator associations. During
the past year, the NTLC has taken up her challenge. A number of the activities
of the NTLC have resulted in increased interactions across professional associations,
many of them stemming from dialog occurring at the most recent National Technology
Leadership Summit, held at the Library of Congress.
One activity involves identification of a proactive approach to a research
agenda for educational technology. This discussion began as a dialog among the
editors of the relevant technology journals at the summit. A keynote panel was
held at SITE 2005 in Phoenix, Arizona, to continue the discussion, followed
by a panel at the 2005 American Educational Research Association meeting in
Vancouver.
Continuation of the dialog is scheduled for a panel at the 2005 National Educational
Computing Conference in Philadelphia. Editorials addressing this important topic
have been published in the spring 2005 issues of the Journal of Research
on Technology in Education and the Journal of Computers in Teacher
Education.
A dialog across conferences, journals, and professional associations is an
important outcome of the coalition. The CITE Journal stands at the center of
this dialog by virtue of its collective sponsorship by participating associations,
and we will be sure to provide periodic updates as the discussion continues.
CITE/JTATE Technology Leadership Awards
Collective identification of best practices is another important mechanism
for professional dialog. The second round of Technology Leadership Awards were
presented in fall 2004.
The CITE/JTATE Technology Leadership Awards were established to recognize exemplary
uses of technology to teach content in teacher education programs. The Technology
Leadership Awards review panel (see appendix) includes
editors from the CITE Journal (which includes representation from a broad array
of professional associations), as well as reviewers from our sister publication,
the Journal of Technology and Teacher Education (JTATE).
The primary objective of the Technology Leadership Awards is to identify and
encourage innovative uses of technology that prepare teachers to enhance student
learning of content (e.g., mathematics, science, English, social studies, etc.).
The focus is on instructional applications rather than uses of technology that
facilitate administrative tasks in the classroom.
Nominees for the awards each submitted a three-page description of their innovative
technology use, as well as online resources and student work samples. Evaluations
of the nominations focused on uses of technology to teach subject-specific content
or pedagogy, student-centered uses of technology, innovations within the educational
context, and demonstrated uses of technology by preservice teachers.
Award Recipients
The selection panel, comprised of reviewers from a broad array
of disciplines, selected one winner in each of three categories:
Use
of Technology to Teach Content in a Methods Course
Alec M. Bodzin, Lehigh University
In the context of course instruction on inquiry-based pedagogical practices
in the classroom, Dr. Bodzin has his students evaluate various Web-based science
inquiry projects and then create their own.
Use
of Technology to Teach Content in an Introductory Technology Course
David Whittier, Boston University
Dr. Whittier partners preservice teachers in his introduction to technology
lab with supervising classroom teachers during a prepracticum field experience
so they can develop Web sites tailored to the in-service teacher’s curriculum
needs.
Use
of Technology to Teach Content in a Student Teaching Experience
Cheryl Lemon, Gateway Regional High School
Cheryl Lemon, currently a first-year teacher, took advantage of every opportunity
to integrate technology into her science instruction during her student teaching
experience – both with honors biology students and with students who struggle
to be successful in academic settings.
We are pleased to provide descriptions of these exemplary uses of technology
in the General section of this issue of CITE Journal. We hope that you will
find the online resources and examples of student work provided to be useful
as a starting point for dialog and best practices.
The Gallery of Exemplary Practices
This year we have added a new feature to give our readers access to additional
innovative uses of technologies. The Gallery of Exemplary Practices includes
descriptions of nominations that received the highest scores from the award
jury:
You Can Participate in the Dialog
The editors of the CITE Journal are soliciting follow-up commentaries to encourage
ongoing dialog on this topic. If your teacher education program is engaged in
similar practices, we would encourage submission of brief commentaries —two-
to four-page contributions commenting on the innovations highlighted, possibly
describing parallel innovations or practice in your own teacher education program.
2005 Award Nominations
Another round of awards is slated for 2005. We encourage you to consider nomination
of exemplary uses of technology in your teacher education program. We are also
seeking nominations for exemplary uses of technology in the following category:
Exemplary Use of Technology to Teach Content by a Novice Teacher During
the Induction Years after Graduation
(first or second year of classroom teaching).
Additional information about the next round of nominations can be found at
the following URL:
http://www.citejournal.org/awards/
Appendix
2004 CITE/JTATE Technology Leadership Selection
Panel
We thank the following members of the selection panel who carefully reviewed
each nomination and its supporting materials.
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education
Glen Bull and Lynn Bell, Co-Editors
Michael Berson
Cindy Bowman
Ann Cunningham
David Hicks
Mark Hofer
Gladis Kersaint
John Lee
Cathy Loving
Natalie Milman
Carol Stuessy
Denisse Thompson
Carl Young
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
Debra Sprague, Editor
Muhammad Betz
Sue Espinoza
David Geelan
David Gibson
Marsha Gladhart
Jeffrey Kenton
Beverly Klecker
Cher Ping Lim
Margaret Lloyd
Monique Lynch
Chrystalla Mouza
Priscilla Norton
Kate Popejoy
James Telese
|